Nature red in tooth and claw

Puffins on Inner Farne Island

We recently went to the Farne Islands on a boat trip. I had been before but not during the nesting season. The islands were absolutely covered with nesting birds; Puffins, Terns, Gannets, and more. The terns vigorously defended their nests, swooping and diving at us when we approached. The whole islands were teaming with life. It is very easy to see the gillemots, they stay on their nests even when people approach close up. The terns swoop at people trying to drive them away from their eggs and young. It is easy to see these birds as inspirational examples of parenthood and devotion to the young. For them the people approaching are seen as real risks, standing up to a ‘predator’ is a matter of life and death.

Gillemot Remains on Nest

We should not forget that the huge nesting population of these islands is fed by the fish in the surrounding ocean. Some birds will eat other’s eggs and young given half a chance. The beauty of these islands is sustained by “nature red in tooth and claw”, the circle of life. How do we as Hindus reconcile the beauty of nature with the death and suffering necessary to sustain it? Why do Hindus practice ahimsa, non-harm, towards all creatures when nature itself involves violence?

Gannets on the Cliff

As Hindus we believe that this circle of physical sustenance overlays a cycle of reincarnation. The two cycles are interlinked, the death of the fish not only sustains life but is instrumental in the advancement of the atma or souls of the creatures. In this way we can see that it is necessary, all part of Shiva’s dance. The book, Dancing with Shiva says:

There is a divine purpose even in the existence of suffering in the world. Suffering cannot be totally avoided. It is a natural part of human life and the impetus for much spiritual growth for the soul. Knowing this, the wise accept suffering from any source, be it hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, famine, wars, disease or inexplicable tragedies. Just as the intense fire of the furnace purifies gold, so does suffering purify the soul to resplendence. So also does suffering offer us the important realization that true happiness and freedom cannot be found in the world, for earthly joy is inextricably bound to sorrow, and worldly freedom to bondage.

Why then should Hindus practice Ahimsa? Most Hindu paths recommend vegetarianism, some schools make it a condition for followers after a certain stage. Why would it be wrong for a Hindu to kill or harm animals, whereas it is not wrong for animals to do so? The Nandinatha Sampradaya (which I follow)  makes this teaching clear:

Ahimsa, or noninjury, is the first and foremost ethical principle of every Hindu. It is gentleness and nonviolence, whether physical, mental or emotional. It is abstaining from causing hurt or harm to all beings. Aum.

I think the difference between us and the animals  is necessity. Animals need to kill others to eat, whereas we have a choice.  We don’t have to kill to live. We have been brought to a point where we can see the necessity for animals to live on others, but we have the option of stepping outside this and not causing harm. This stepping outside is a necessary part of spiritual advancement, bringing us closer to God.

Also, the way that meat is produced now is a far cry from living in nature. Animals are farmed often in cramped and cruel conditions, and fattened up to be slaughtered as soon as practical. This means that for people to eat meat in the modern world does a lot more harm that one animal killing another. In nature the animals live a full and free life up to the time they are killed.

I should point out that there are a few people who do live completely within the circle of life. There are Inuits, Native Americans, Aborigines, African bush-men, and more who don’t have the option of not eating meat, it is necessary for their survival. The animals that are killed do live a full life, for them there is no difference between being hunted by animals or by these people living in tune with nature. Most, maybe all of these people have respect for the animals they kill, praying for the souls of those they kill. In this way they avoid the harm associated with killing. I respect the path taken by these people too, though it is not the Hindu path.

So, as Hindus we should look at the circle of life as part of the savage beauty of nature. All is Shiva’s dance, and is as intended. We should step outside it though, and treat all life with reverence and harm none.

Aum Shivaya

6 responses to “Nature red in tooth and claw

  1. akshey kotwal


    As per my knowledge of Karm Yoga,any work is bad if it has a selfish motive,
    if your killing someone for your benefit it is a crime,but if if you are killing someone
    with no selfish motive like soldier fighting for his country it is not crime in fact not doing so is crime as per gita.

    So violence as such is not good or bad but the motives.


    • Akshey,
      Yes, you are quite right about that, a soldier fighting for a just cause or a policeman shooting a dangerous dog are examples of where killing is within dharma. It is preferable to avoid it if possible though. Satguru Sivaya Subramuniyaswami wrote:

      In following dharma the only rigid rule is wisdom. My Sat Guru Siva Yogaswami said, “It is a sin to kill the tiger in the jungle. But if he comes into the village, it may become your duty.” A Hindu would give warnings to the tiger, would try to capture the tiger without injury.

      Aum Shivaya

      • Tandav,

        It does come to my mind,in almost all of our actions an element of violence is involved every time we breathe ,every time we walk countless microorganisms are killed,we can’t avoid that and I think we can’t be held responsible for that.

        Hinduism has a practical explanation for this ,though I don’t know much about other religions but i feel they don’t have the proper explanation for this ,the excessive emphasis on non-violence will make life difficult only.

        The work of Vivekananda has certainly solved many of my questions which used to trouble me a lot.

  2. Very nicely put!

  3. Hello,

    I’m new here and this is my first post.

    Everything in ‘Nature red in tooth and claw’ is exactly how I feel. Ahimsa is what I strive to base my life on and as I practice it I find that it grows exponentially. The more sensitive I become the stronger I seem to be, which surprises me because I’ve thought that one of the reasons people become insensitive is to avoid falling apart when they realize the horror of himsa. Some (still small) kind of ability to withstand the pain associated with seeing and feeling clearly is a gift that I wasn’t expecting. I still have to look away when I see a graphic depiction of animal abuse that accompanies some of the email petitions I sign, but I do feel a growing strength to deal with the pain of seeing himsa more than I thought I would. It will be interesting to see where it takes me from here.

    I’m part way through the Master Course and have found no other path that speaks to me the way the Nandinatha Sampradaya does, so it’s fantastic to have found this blog!


    • Namaste Melinda,
      The master course is great isn’t it. Gurudeva talks about “affectionate detachment” or “loving detachment” making us stronger:

      Affectionate detachment is stronger than any attachment could possibly be, because attachment is created through unfulfilled desire, salted and peppered with fear. Fear of loss, fear of the unexpected, fear that life may not have much more to offer than what has already been offered, fear of old age, fear of harm, fear of accident — these are the fears which salt and pepper the unfulfilled desires. This is attachment.

      I think that this is what your growing strength is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s